Showing posts with label Lumia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lumia. Show all posts

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Nokia officially announces the Lumia 1020, with 41MP camera and six lenses

Nokia officially announces the Lumia 1020 41MP, 6


We can't say we were really taken aback with shock at the news, but Nokia has officially unveiled its latest imaging flagship, the Lumia 1020. The 41MP Windows Phone, which has been anticipated by many enthusiasts since the 808 PureView was introduced, is looked at Nokia as "the next chapter in smartphone photography." With the phone only offered in yellow, black and white hues, it's not the most colorful device in the Finnish company's repertoire, but Elop's gang is hopeful that it can make up for the lack of color with a stellar imaging experience: in addition to the high megapixel count, the 1020 will feature OIS and six Carl Zeiss lenses.


Developing...


Stay up to date on the latest news from Nokia with our liveblog of today's event!


Tags: breaking news, mobilepostcross, nokia

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Nokia Lumia 720 review

Nokia Lumia 720 review


With the shared unveiling of Nokia's Lumia 720 and Lumia 520, the company's running flush of Windows Phone 8 models was complete. All WP8 handsets we've reviewed essentially fit into two distinct tiers based on shared core specs. That begs the question: why come out with two new models now when both share the same SoC, amount of RAM and screen resolution as the established Lumia 620 and HTC 8S? Obviously, there are differences in design, cameras, display tech and all the other bobs and bits that create the 720, but is it worth the significant markup over the 620, and more than double the price of a 520 or Huawei Ascend W1? Enough with all the rhetorical questions -- join us after the break as we find out exactly what the Lumia 720 has to offer.


Nokia Lumia 720 review



Hardware



We've taken quite a liking to the design philosophy Nokia has carried through its Windows Phone 8 range to date, and the 720 is further proof the company has a good eye. A simple, clean rectangle, the handset measures 127.9 x 67.5 x 9mm (5.04 x 2.65 x 0.35 inches), making it one the thinnest WP8 offerings. It shares obvious traits with HTC's 8X and Huawei's Ascend W1, which have the same sharp angles that feel like a tangible manifestation of Microsoft's Live Tile UI. While its hard lines give the 720 an air of sophistication, Nokia hasn't forgotten to add that playful Lumia flair. The round edges of the device balloon ever so slightly from the single piece of sculpted Gorilla Glass 2 that covers the entire front face, before tapering inwards to the flat back. The corners, sides and back are all one piece of polycarbonate, which in our case was red. Well, mostly red -- it has a nice two-tone effect (albeit subtler than the 620's "dual-shot color" shells) that causes it to glow with more of an orange hue when brightly lit. There are also models bearing the other familiar Lumia colors of cyan, yellow, white and black, but here in the UK, the 720's currently exclusive to O2 in red (although our review handset came unlocked from Nokia.)



Nokia hasn't forgotten to add that playful Lumia flair.


Those rounded edges serve as a buffer to the sharp overall aesthetic and, along with the flat back, make for a really comfortable hold. The grippy polycarbonate shell helps keep it anchored in the palm, and at 128 grams (4.5 ounces), it's deceptively light for such a solid-feeling handset. It may not be forged from metal, but build quality is robust and gives the 720 a premium vibe. In terms of footprint, the 720 is just shy of matching Samsung's Galaxy S III, despite having half an inch less of display on the diagonal. That said, the 720 doesn't look or feel like bloated hardware around a small screen -- there isn't an excess of bezel to the left or right of the panel and all other space is allotted proportionally. Also, your thumb won't have any trouble getting where it needs to go.


Now, gather round for the tour. Joining the 4.3-inch display under the Gorilla Glass 2 sheet that consumes the 720's face are the standard back, home and search capacitive keys. Above the screen, you'll find a small, grey Nokia logo below the earpiece, with the 1.3-megapixel front-facing camera just to the left. The bottom edge is home to a micro-USB port and mic, while the left side is bare apart from the microSD drawer at the earpiece end. On the top edge are a 3.5mm headphone socket and another drawer for the micro-SIM, with the volume rocker, power button and two-stage camera button in Nokia's standard layout on the right-hand side.

Nokia Lumia 720 review a midrange handset with a lowend heart


The back panel is as clean and understated as the rest of the device. Up top is the 6.7-megapixel main shooter with a small flash off to its left and tiny black Carl Zeiss branding below it. In the center is a black Nokia logo embossed lengthwise into the body, and at the bottom-right corner is a subtle rounded-square loudspeaker grille. Towards the middle of the bottom lie three round metallic pads, which, when paired with an optional cover, grant the 720 Qi wireless charging for its sizable 2,000mAh non-removable battery. In the right lighting, you can see the dark innards which spread upwards from the three points on the bottom to envelop the battery. Committing halfway to wireless charging and requiring additional hardware to utilize it are curious design decisions, and it feels like an unnecessary inclusion.


Right at the bottom of the back panel is a glossy CE mark (a European certification) with "Model: 720 Made in China" in almost illegibly small font below. Unfortunately, this looks altogether messy on what's otherwise a tidy handset. Continuing with the nitpicking, the spring-loaded microSD and micro-SIM drawers sink into the body a trifle (i.e., they don't sit flush with the edges), and we were able to force a slight wiggle from the cage on our model. While the phone as a whole is definitively inflexible, the center of the back panel gives ever so slightly when squeezed, producing a light cracking sound -- this is more of an observation and not something for concern. Highlighting such minor issues should give you a hint as to what we think of the hardware design in general. We like it... we like it a lot.


Nokia Lumia 720 Dimensions 127.9 x 67.5 x 9mm (5.04 x 2.65 x 0.35 inch)


Weight 4.5 oz. (128g)


 Screen size 4.3 inches


Screen resolution 800 x 480 (217 ppi)


Screen type IPS LCD, ClearBlack, Sensitive Touch


Battery 2,000mAh Li-Polymer (non-removable)


 Internal storage 8GB


External storage microSD (up to 64GB)


Rear camera 6.7MP, BSI, f/1.9, Carl Zeiss lens


Front-facing cam 1.3MP, f/2.4


Video capture 720p (front and back)


NFC Yes


Radios GSM (850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900)
           WCDMA (850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100)


 Bluetooth v3.0 with EDR, A2DP


SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus (MSM8227)


 CPU 1GHz dual-core


GPU Adreno 305


 RAM 512MB


WiFi Dual-band, 802.11b/g/n


Wireless Charging Yes (with optional case)


Operating system Windows Phone 8 Display


 DNP Nokia Lumia 720 review a midrange handset with a lowend heart



Let's get the specs out of the way first: 4.3-inch IPS LCD with ClearBlack technology and Sensitive Touch, 800 x 480 resolution, 217 ppi. What the makers of flagships with HD screens don't want you know is that WVGA is still a pretty common resolution, especially for Windows Phone 8 devices. In fact, the 520, 620, 720, 820, 8S and Ascend W1 all have 800 x 480 displays between 3.8 and 4.3 inches in size. We could reason that WVGA screens, and the resources needed for them, make for more affordable smartphones; or, that the Live Tile-based WP8 landing screen and all-around minimalistic UI render wonderfully at this res. But, if you lost interest after seeing "800 x 480," here's our Hail Mary elevator pitch: it's kinda awesome.


Pixelation in apps and menus isn't really an issue. It's there to some extent if you look hard enough, but the WP8 UI helps disguise it. We're surprised there isn't a noticeable drop in quality when compared with the Lumia 620's screen, which crams the WVGA resolution into its smaller 3.8-inch panel (246 ppi). Colors are rich and vibrant; whites are accurate; and blacks rank among the best we've seen, helped by Nokia's ClearBlack technology. The black of the screen is often indiscernible from the darkness of the bezel, making the entire front face look like it's supporting the Live Tile grid. Viewing angles, outdoor visibility, brightness (and the auto-adjust setting) are all great. Color us impressed, but we can't totally overlook the resolution. Whether from local files, YouTube or Netflix, it's a perfectly adequate screen upon which to watch moving pictures (the loudspeakers have a bit of punch, too), but you know you're missing out on those finer details. This would also be the case for games, but those with more advanced graphics aren't compatible with handsets rocking 512MB of RAM.

Software
Nokia Lumia 720 review


You're probably well aware by now: the Lumia 720 runs Windows Phone 8. You can check out our full review of the latest version of Microsoft's mobile OS here, but let's break it down briefly. WP8 is stripped back and simple. Beyond the lock screen is your Live Tile home screen and, on an adjacent panel, is a list of all your apps and core features like settings, messages, emails, et al. It's really easy to get the hang of, and Microsoft has built an OS that runs great on hardware that Android handsets laugh at. The OS is a major, if not the deciding factor when considering new handsets, so pondering whether WP8 is right for you isn't wasted time. On WP8, you're basically tied to Internet Explorer, so be ready to invest some time in moving those bookmarks across if IE isn't your default browser elsewhere.



Because this is a Lumia, you've got access to a bunch of exclusive apps.


Once you're all set up, though, WP8 is relatively transparent, easy to navigate and a cinch to understand. Our handset came straight from Nokia, so it was just a case of uninstalling the Angry Birds Roost pseudo-store to rid it of bloatware. Because this is a Lumia, you've got access to a bunch of exclusive apps not available on other Windows Phones, such as PhotoBeamer, Nokia Music and Pulse messenger (currently in beta). There is also a host of imaging apps that afford you advanced features not available within the stock camera software: Cinemagraph, Creative Studio, Glam Me, Panorama and Smart Shoot. Several of these and Nokia's Here navigation aids come pre-installed on the 720, with any omissions easily downloadable from the software store.


Of the Here apps for the 720, only City Lens is exclusive to Lumias. Curiously, Here Drive+ beta, which is bundled with the arguably lower-end 620, doesn't make an appearance. Instead, you get Here Drive (available on all Windows Phones) -- a sat-nav app that is limited to the country your micro-SIM is allied to. Drive+, on the other hand, is global, and considering the 720 is launching at a relatively high price point for second-tier WP8 phones, its absence feels a little cheap on Nokia's part. You've also got to remember that the 720 lacks support for a handful of apps by default, due to RAM requirements. But, at least the Twitter client is slick, right?

Camera
DNP Nokia Lumia 720 review distinguished yet confusing


The 720's rear-facing camera is one of the main components that sets it apart from other WP8 models with otherwise similar core specs. While the 520, 620, 8S and Ascend W1 all have five megapixels to work with, the 720 has a 6.7-megapixel BSI sensor, Carl Zeiss lens and f/1.9 aperture. Before we get to that, though, let's take a quick pass over the 1.3-megapixel selfie shooter on the front face. The wide-angle lens with f/2.4 aperture is capable of taking some crisp and well-colored photos in daylight (read: good conditions), but starve it of light or bring it inside and the resulting pictures are extremely noisy. Under artificial light, you can see the exposure compensation stuttering in the viewfinder as it struggles to adjust.


Shooting 720p video on the front-facer results in much the same experience. If you're inside or caught by failing light, it's going to be just like the stills: grainy. In favorable conditions, video exhibits an acceptable framerate and quality, but has a tendency to radically shift white balance if filming on the auto setting, making for inconsistent clips. Let's be honest: front-facing cameras aren't selling points. You're not going to be overcome with disappointment when using it for the odd video call or self-portrait. Nokia's Glam Me airbrushing / filter app specifically for front-facing shots comes pre-installed on the 720, so there's that to play with.

Nokia Lumia 720 review


Like most touchscreen handsets, you can tap on the screen to direct focus and take a picture, but, as with all Windows Phones, there's a physical, two-stage camera button available to focus the main camera before shooting. We found this toggle a little too sensitive on other review handsets, but that's not the case on our 720. The two levels are clearly defined, so no frustrations there. Shutter response, however, leaves a lot to be desired. It takes a good two seconds for the lens to focus, the picture to be taken and the saving animation to finish before you're ready for the next close-up. It's pretty painful, and a steady hand is essential during the sluggish process to avoid filling a microSD card full of blurry shots.



Shutter response leaves a lot to be desired.


If you're unfamiliar with the core WP8 camera app, it's pretty basic with only a handful of settings for both picture and video modes: scene type, ISO, exposure, white balance and aspect ratio. Within the subsections, there are limited options and we only strayed from automatic settings to shoot in low light. On the viewfinder screen, you can set the flash type, switch between cameras and still / video modes, as well as access the other photography apps. There aren't any advanced features in the core app like HDR, burst capture, panorama, slow-motion video, etc. To get at these, you're kicked out of the standard camera interface into discrete apps, with loading screens in between. We've got Cinemagraph, Glam Me, Panorama, Smart Shoot and Microsoft's Photosynth app installed. Panorama is a solid app that's easy to use and does a great job of stitching snaps together, even if exposure sometimes varies across the canvas. Smart Shoot is Nokia's take on the burst-capture mode, but the app can't improve the shutter lag on the 720, so it's only slightly quicker than taking a couple of regular shots in succession.


So, how about that 6.7-megapixel, Carl Zeiss lens camera round the back? Overall, we've got mixed feelings. When taking our sample shots, we didn't tinker with the settings much apart from selecting the appropriate scene type (night, close-up, etc.). Finding the best results came when we left the 720 to make up its own mind in auto. By doing that, however, you're at the handset's mercy. Some shots came out crisp, with HDR-esque vibrancy and contrast, while others were dark or appeared to have all the color sucked out of them. Macro shots were agreeably consistent, by and large. Without the help of the sun, things got a little worse. Colors just weren't represented correctly in artificial light. With those bulbs turned off and given the right distance, the small flash kicked out enough rays to keep overexposure to a minimum. We don't expect you'll be using the flash that often, though, as the f/1.9 aperture and BSI sensor suck up every bit of light in dim conditions and made for some impressive snaps. We found some tradeoffs in quality, and the focus failed 50 percent of the time, but Nokia's low-light pedigree was very apparent here. It doesn't equal the low-light performance of the Lumia 920 by any means, but it's close enough for comparison, which is a good thing.


Nokia Lumia 720 camera samples



 


Video recording with the main camera (720p, 30 fps) isn't as good as stills in low light, but you do feel some of the benefit of that aperture and sensor. Daylight recording is smooth, but there's no complicated image stabilization tech to mask shaking. We've no qualms with sound capture, but will say the autofocus occasionally stuttered, and brightness wasn't particularly consistent throughout a recording. It's worth noting that video startup was around one second -- half the time it took to snap a still.


Performance and battery life
Nokia Lumia 720 review


There are two distinct classes of WP8 devices. In the higher tier are the likes of the 820, 920, HTC 8X and Samsung's ATIV S -- with their fancy dual-core 1.5GHz Snapdragon S4 Plus / Adreno 225 GPU chips and 1GB of RAM. The 720, however, is in the lower tier, along with the 520, 620, and 8S, which share a common dual-core 1GHz Snapdragon S4 Plus with Adreno 305 GPU and 512MB of RAM, as well as 800 x 480 resolutions. Huawei's Ascend W1 is a slight anomaly, falling into the lower bracket on most specs, but its S4 Plus is clocked at 1.2GHz. Like the 520, 620 and 820, the 720 has 8GB of onboard storage, expandable via microSD, with 7GB of free SkyDrive space, to boot.


As the benchmarks show, there's nothing to distinguish the 720 from its peers in the lower class. Not that any difference was expected -- it's the same SoC in a different outfit. What that means is there's nothing to really say about the 720's performance that hasn't been said of competing devices. It boots from dead to usable in roughly 30 seconds. You can jump right into the core features (messages, settings, etc.) in under a second, lighter apps such as Music+Video in three to four and heavier software like Nokia Music can load for upwards of five seconds. Nothing feels slow, mind. Anything that doesn't come up instantly will present you with a loading animation, so any shortcomings of the hardware are disguised by these fluid transitions -- you don't see apps stutter into life, freeze on the screen or lag perceptively.

Lumia 920 Lumia 820 Lumia 720 Lumia 620 Lumia 520 HTC 8S HTC 8X Samsung ATIV S WPBench 227 224 179 180 178 180 221 241 Battery rundown 2:36 2:07 4:36 3:41 2:41 3:30 2:30 2:38 SunSpider (ms, lower numbers are better) 914 909 1,440 1,443 1,400 1,415 914 890 AnTuTu (*GFX test off) 10,957* 11,506 7,348 7,479 7,350 7,333 11,775 12,064

That's no mistake, folks. When subjected to the WPBench battery rundown test (it was still pulling emails over WiFi, too), the 720's 2,000mAh battery lasted over four and half hours. It's by far the biggest power pack in any of the 1GHz WP8 handsets, with its closest rival being the 1,700mAh cell that powers the 8S (although the 620's 1,300mAh battery beat the 8S in the rundown test). Its triumph in testing is reflected in normal usage. You can get a day of heavy usage out of it, but under normal circumstances, it should be good for 36 hours without needing a top-up. With the charger included in the box, it refuels at a rate of approximately 50 percent per hour.



Apps are starting to crop up with a minimum requirement of 1GB.


We would like to try out some games that push the 720's hardware to its limits, but as previously mentioned, we don't really have that option with only 512MB of RAM. Apps are starting to crop up with a minimum requirement of 1GB. The 3D racer Asphalt 7: Heat, Modern Combat 4 and Nokia's own Xpress cloud-compression browser are on this list, as is the recently released original Temple Run -- hardly the Crysis of mobile gaming. As Microsoft's platform is maturing, we can only assume the 1GB requirement is going to become more commonplace. Hopefully, Windows Phone 8.1 will be 512MB-compatible, or a lot of people are going to be disappointed.

Nokia Lumia 720 review a midrange handset with a lowend heart


Internet browsing is snappy on the handset, both for mobile and desktop sites. Zooming is done quickly, without lag, and when backing out, it takes only a moment to fill back in what was cropped out. It's quite hard to fault, really. To access the web, you'll be using WiFi, which maintains a solid connection at a distance, or over HSPA+ at up to 21.1 Mbps when out and about. Sorry, there's no LTE chip, which is a bit of a faux pas in the States and is becoming increasingly more relevant in the UK. The radios are good for GSM (850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900) and WCDMA (850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100) networks.


In other miscellany, audio quality through headphones is rich and well-balanced (although not quite as good as the iPhone 4S), but don't turn it up too loud, because it will go up to 11 -- or 30, to be exact. The loudspeaker will bring the noise, too, albeit low-quality noise. Call quality is sharp; GPS lock-on is basically instantaneous; and Bluetooth connections are solid when the 720 eventually finds whatever peripheral you're trying to pair it with. Using NFC to partner with a 620 for beaming a photo sped up the process significantly.

The competition
DNP Nokia Lumia 720 review distinguished yet confusing


We're really struggling to find the hook which sets Nokia's Lumia 720 apart from all the other handsets with similar specs, so let's look at its positioning in the UK (note: there's no sign of any US carriers picking it up). O2 has been on a rampage, picking up practically all the WP8 devices we've mentioned throughout this review, and they're all available on PAYG to make the comparison a little easier. HTC's 8S costs £170 ($260); the 620 is £150 ($229); the 520 is £120 ($183); and Huawei's Ascend W1 is merely £109 ($167). The 720, however, is £300 ($458) -- in other words, not far off the price of three W1s, which carries the 1.2GHz S4 Plus.

Wrap-up Nokia Lumia 720 review

More Info Lumia 720 preview Windows Phone 8 review Lumia 620 review

Do the small perks afforded to the 720 justify that price? You get a slightly better shooter than all the other models, a bigger screen at the same resolution and peripheral-assisted wireless charging. The only real specification that excites us is the longer battery life, but we're all now accustomed to the nightly charging ritual, so we're not convinced it's worth the price hike. We can't exactly ignore the extras -- each has their own cost, and we understand it adds up. However, it would make more sense to ditch the half-baked Qi integration and upgrade the RAM instead. We get the appeal of the 520: it's entering as the cheapest way to get that colorful Lumia style. We imagine Nokia's attempting to place the 720 as a mid-range device, but what's fundamentally wrong with the handset is that it represents slowly aging hardware in a pretty dress, with a few catchy slogans attached.


Edgar Alvarez contributed to this review.


Source

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Nokia Lumia 521 for T-Mobile given FCC approval

Nokia Lumia 521 for TMobile caught with FCC approval


RM-917. It may not sound like much on the outside, but the model number and above picture correspond with the Nokia Lumia 521, T-Mobile's version of the lower-end Lumia 520 announced at MWC last month. We still don't have any details on when it'll show up on retail shelves, but it's at least made its way through one of the final barriers to entry: the FCC approval process. As you might expect, the docs are low on details, but the frequencies support 850 / AWS / 1900 HSPA+ / UMTS as well as quadband GSM / EDGE. To refresh your memory, the 520 will sport a 4-inch WVGA LCD panel, 512MB RAM, a 5MP camera, microSD storage and quite a few other respectable goodies. Head to the source if you're a sucker for numbers and acronyms.


Source: FCC

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Nokia Lumia 520 tries to arrive at FCC incognito, given away by codename

Nokia Lumia 520 tries to arrive at FCC incognito, given away by codename


Nokia just tried to hustle a certain RM-914 model through the FCC, but thanks to an earlier glance at the Fed's Indonesian counterpart POSTEL, we know we're actually looking at the Lumia 520. As the Finnish outfit just announced, that model represents the new low-end of its Windows Phone 8 line, though it's decently spec'd with a dual-core 1GHz Snapdragon CPU, 4-inch 800 x 480 IPS display and 1,430mAh battery. While eschewing LTE, the device will pack various WCDMA and HSPA+ frequencies for 3G, though in this case, we're not looking at WCDMA 900 / 2100 bands, meaning it's indeed a US model. Its next stop ought to be store shelves later this quarter -- followed by your pocket, if the $183 or so WP8 handset rings your bell.


Source: FCC

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Rethinking the flagship: The case for Nokia's Lumia 620

DNP Is this the phone that could rescue Nokia


It's easy to dismiss the Lumia 620 as yet another cheaply-priced smartphone, but that isn't the case. In fact, Nokia's latest release made me completely rethink Windows Phone. Sure, the mobile OS lacks the app selection of its rivals, but maybe I didn't need them to begin with. Maybe I didn't need the same processor found in rival Android devices to run an OS that's generally much lighter and more direct. Perhaps Nokia thought the same thing, because in reading over the Lumia 620's spec sheet, there's a lot of decidedly low-to-middleweight hardware. But it's hundreds of dollars less than the Lumia 920 and once I got my hands on it, I realized this was the Windows Phone I had been waiting for.



Nokia needs a success. So does Microsoft -- it's been two years to the day since Windows Phone 7 was first announced


Nokia needs a success. So does Microsoft -- it's been two years to the day since Windows Phone 7 was first announced. Since then, we've seen Nokia transplant its ill-fated N9 into the stylish Lumia 800; then the bigger (and not as slick) Lumia 900 tried to crack America. On the sidelines, second-string Lumias like the 710 or the 610 arrived to antipathy. They lacked the design punch, build quality (and colors!) of the high-end iterations. Then late in 2012, Windows Phone 8 arrived and the pocket-straining Lumia 920 was unfortunately pitted against the Galaxy S III and the iPhone 5. An operating system that still had to prove itself was now going up against Android's and iOS' strongest players and on a two-year contract, to boot! That's a deep bet to make on a fledgling, niche OS. The Lumia 920 attempted to play on its strengths (like admittedly superb low-light photos and an enhanced touchscreen) to warrant the premium, but it doesn't quite hit home for me. Dropping any price-tag pretension, it's the Lumia 620 that is Nokia's most compelling Windows Phone to date.


What do you want from a smartphone? Apps are important. We've said it. Even phone makers have said it. But they're not important to everyone. I have friends wheeling around One Xes, conned convinced by me that it was the phone to get, but have they bought into Google Play? Nope; they play a mix of free games (some of them plain awful) and have installed a handful of common apps that they spend most of their time on, most (though not all) of which are available on Windows Phone 8. Not everyone needs glossy gaming remakes, DJing apps or news aggregation.



Regardless of mobile OS, the people in my anecdotal sample consistently use the web browser and maps more than any specific app. That fresh two-year-contract-bound slab might be capable of more, but there are plenty out there that will settle for "capable enough." Unfortunately, that's often not been the case with cheaper phones in the UK. Here, plenty of carrier-specific pay-as-you-go Android phones try to offer the full smartphone experience but fail to deliver. Nokia's newest Lumia is priced here at £150 (around $236) on O2, contract-free (a canny enough price that's already convinced two Engadget editors to buy one each). This undercuts not only other Windows Phone 8 devices -- HTC's 8S is the closest, but it still costs £100 £30-plus more -- but also capable entry- to mid-level Android phones like Samsung's Galaxy Ace II.



It's worth mentioning the Korean rival, because it's the very company that's gone on to sell an explosive number of phones in Nokia's stead. Samsung managed to sell 30 million units in five months. That was just one device: the Galaxy S III.


It's worth mentioning its Korean rival, because it's the very company that's gone on to sell an explosive number of phones in Nokia's stead. Samsung managed to sell 30 million units in five months. That was just one device: the Galaxy S III. Pull together all those Galaxies and it totals more than 100 million. Meanwhile, Nokia sold 6.9 million Lumias (the whole family) in the last six months. It's a completely different scale.


Nokia has known those kinds of numbers and if it wants to get back there, it (and Microsoft) should be pitching not to someone that already owns an old iPhone or Android, but to the remaining crowd that's looking for its first smartphone. Would the company be willing to lose the high-premium flagship fight? Plenty of phone makers hold on to the idea that their best, most technically impressive products will act as a halo, drawing people to its family of devices, where they will then pluck the one most appropriate for their wallet. This is probably why Nokia focused all of its attention (and arguably, affections) on the Lumia 920 at its reveal event, while the lesser 820 was left in a darkened corner of the showroom.



But it's more than that: think of those print features that pit a handful of "top phones" against each other. Even here at Engadget we have to choose which phones to compare against just-announced devices. Were Nokia to focus all their attention on a smaller flagship, would it lose that premium cachet it's built up over the years? Would it get less attention? Something that Apple has learned is that with the highest price comes the highest premiums per unit. If Nokia were selling cheaper handsets, margins on devices that were made to be cost-savvy would likely be even further squeezed.


Should this matter? I don't think it should. Nokia's core smartphone option, Windows Phone, still struggles to claim a meaningful share of the smartphone market. Nokia and BlackBerry are now tragically jockeying for third place -- and even that is a sliver compared to the two frontrunners. It needs to try something different. Until now, Nokia hasn't pushed one of the mobile OS' real strengths: it gets very good mileage on smaller smartphone engines, something that's demonstrated on the Lumia 620. Plus, for better or worse, the lack of intensive gaming apps to push Windows Phones means the two-dimensional titles on offer don't make the most of what's housed inside the HTC 8X or Lumia 920.


Many of us just want a good camera, web browser and map experience and these last two are well-served on the Lumia 620. When we jumped into Internet Explorer, the phone responded nigh-on identically to the bigger Lumia phones. Microsoft's browser might lack the sharing options of Android competitors, but the responsiveness was comparable to similarly priced Google phones. Move on to Nokia's map service and it's still one of the only valid alternatives to Google Maps -- other editors even reckon it's superior. Read up on our other Windows Phone reviews and you'll find even those initial single-core Windows Phones gave a smooth performance, UI hiccups and weaknesses aside. There's just less need for Android-rivaling processor oomph.



Nokia's core smartphone option, Windows Phone, still struggles to claim a meaningful share of the smartphone market.


Instead of gingerly exploring Microsoft's app store and getting bored wading through the chaff (like I did), Nokia has managed to throw in camera apps, like a GIF maker, burst photography and panorama mode. Then there's its Music service that offers offline music lists for free. These are quickly accessed (and some pre-installed) through Nokia's curated store -- something that that still has a place on operating systems.


The main problem with recommending Windows Phone to those that have already bought an iOS or Android device is the app store continues to lag behind -- Spotify has only just landed on version 8. But if a potential customer's requirements are lower (and coming from a feature phone, they likely are), it's less of an issue, especially when a phone like the Lumia 620 doesn't entail a heavy cash payout. Given that gentle price, there's also a chance for curious smartphone fans to dabble in Windows Phone, buying the phone outright and substituting in their AT&T or T-Mobile SIM -- another opportunity for Microsoft to convince users to make the switch.


As Apple and Samsung dominated the smartphone market, it was a tough 2012 for Nokia and while it pulled in a profit for the final three months, annual losses still amounted to $3 billion. Interestingly, Symbian sales still amounted to 2.2 million, but those figures are in decline. Its influence in places like India, where Symbian still sells, is fading, while Samsung jostles for space in stores with multiple entry-level devices. Nokia needs new hardware to sell in its place, phones that are better than the noticeably cheaper Windows Phones it's been selling there so far. The Lumia 620 is that phone.

DNPEditorial This is Nokia's best Lumia phone


India has the lowest smartphone uptake in the Asian-Pacific region and while the Lumia 510 (already out in India) might be cheaper, it's already trapped in an old version of the OS, with only a $50 dollar difference in price. The more powerful -- and simply more attractive -- Lumia 620 is a far stronger proposition. And there are plenty of people to pitch to -- according to Cybermedia Research (CMR), phone shipments in India totaled more than 100 million in the first half of 2012.



Nokia needs to grab those first-time smartphone shoppers and Windows Phone 8 offers a great hardware equalizer, and a chance for success.


Smartphones accounted for "just" 5.5 million. The same research puts Nokia first in market share, claiming 22.2 percent of total phones shipped, but focus on smartphones and Samsung (with 41.6 percent) more than doubles Nokia's 19.2 percent share. Stare into the future, and those smartphone-feature phone figures will be flipped. Nokia needs to grab those first-time smartphone shoppers and Windows Phone 8 offers a great hardware equalizer, and a chance for success.


Nokia's proven flair for hardware design, a knack that even Apple's attorney mentioned during its legal scuffle with Samsung, looks like it's finally bleeding down to the rest of the Lumia line. With a lightweight OS and a lack of intensive apps, Windows Phone lets Nokia sidestep (to some extent) hardware one-upmanship at every iteration. The Lumia 620 demonstrates this, with a price that doesn't make your wallet tremble. Not everyone needs a flagship, but everyone can appreciate a well-priced smartphone that delivers.


(Update: Several readers have got in touch to suggest that HTC's 8S can now be purchased contract-free for £180. We've updated the post.)


Source

Friday, February 15, 2013

Mystery Nokia smartphone flaunted in European Lumia 920 ad

Nokia Lumia 920 ad from Europe shows a mystery model


A recent Nokia Lumia 920 TV spot from Netherlands carrier KPN Mobiel and spotted by My Nokia Blog shows a curious yellow handset at the five second mark, and after squinting for a bit we're still not sure what we're seeing. It's obviously not a 920, and it doesn't match any other existing models that we can remember. Our mobile experts noticed that it vaguely resembles the Nokia Lumia 822 from US carrier Verizon, but the headphone nub, camera pod position and tapered design don't match that model -- which also appears to be smaller than the one pictured above. Could the Finnish carrier be holding out on us until a certain event happening soon? Or is it some kind of Dutch variant of the 822? We've no idea, but if any of you do, we're sure you'll let us know below. You can scope the video after the fold.



Via: WM Power User


Source: KPM (YouTube)


More Coverage: My Nokia Blog

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Nokia Lumia 620 review: precisely what an entry-level smartphone should be

Nokia Lumia 620 review precisely how an entrylevel smartphone should be

More Info Nokia announces the Lumia 620 Nokia Lumia 920 review Windows Phone 8 review

The Lumia 620 is Nokia's most affordable Windows Phone 8 device yet. Alas, it's a device that might never make an appearance in the US, due to its very attractive pricing of (£150, or around $236), unless American carriers are willing to give a rebate from the outset. But it's a surprisingly attractive Lumia -- in fact it's hard to put it in the same category as Nokia's previous cheaper Windows Phone options. Those colors hit you right between the eyes, with matte- and gloss-finish covers in cyan, lime, yellow and magenta presenting a nice alternative to the more staid black and white versions. Behind that shell, a 1GHz Snapdragon S4 Plus beats away, with a bright 3.8-inch ClearBlack display beaming out a familiar 800 x 480 resolution.


Despite the price, it's running the latest iteration of Windows Phone 8 and Nokia's also ensured its own camera lens apps, along with its music and mapping services, have been carried over as well. The 5-megapixel camera may be bested by the Zeiss-equipped 8-megapixel sensors on its bigger brothers, but with a staggering £300 difference between the Lumia 620 and Lumia 920, what other sacrifices have been made? Is this the best bang-for-your-buck Windows Phone we've ever seen? We think it might be.Nokia Lumia 620 reviewSee all photoswhen.eng("eng.galleries.init")

Hardware


After trying out both the Lumia 920 and the Lumia 820, it's a relief to see Nokia's phone footprint shrink so that it's closer to 2011's Lumia 800. The 620 model has a marginally larger screen than that polycarb-crafted phone, but it feels just as comfortable in our hands -- one-handed use is a non-issue. While the screen's surface is completely flat, the edges curve around gently, forming a rounded back.



Due to the way the covers are formed (two different color layers, for the likes of the lime-green and orange options) they've come out in very vivid hues.


The entire cover can be pried off by pressing down on the camera unit and pulling at the top edge of the covering. Does it feel as plasticky as the Lumia 610? Nope. Wobbly? A little -- there's a minor amount of give in the center of the back, but the cover and device feel unified and solid. Better still, due to the way the covers are formed (two different color layers, for the likes of the lime-green and orange options) they've come out in very vivid hues -- the soft-finish cyan shell is this editor's personal favorite. The cases can also take a fair amount of damage from drops, with the easily breakable headphone port built into each case rather than the phone itself.

DNP Nokia Lumia 620 review precisely what an entrylevel smartphone should be


Nokia has added a front-facing VGA camera to this model (a first for an entry-level Nokia Windows Phone), while a 5-megapixel sensor and flash are centered on the back. For fans of the Lumia series, the front is even more familiar. The screen is framed with about 2mm of bezel at the sides, with space above it for the aforementioned VGA camera and earpiece. Below the TFT screen, you'll find the staple three-button capacitive control panel.


Along the right edge, there's still a hard camera button -- and all the buttons seem to have more give than last year's Nokia devices. The micro-USB port sits along the bottom with the primary microphone, while the headphone socket belongs at the top, replete with a secondary mic. It's worth mentioning that the Lumia 620 has been gifted with the same distortion-free, high-amplitude mics embedded inside the Lumia 920 -- more on that in the camera section. Meanwhile the Lumia 620's built-in speaker is apparently 20 decibels louder than Nokia's flagship phone, able to penetrate thin walls at a maximum of 100 decibels.

Nokia Lumia 620 review how an entrylevel smartphone should be


If you want your music louder, the phone is also compatible with JBL's wireless speakers through its built-in NFC, while a removable 1,300mAh battery resides next to the space for a microSD card. There's already 8GB of built-in storage from the outset, while Microsoft is still offering 7GB of cloud storage through SkyDrive -- in short, there are plenty of storage options. There's just 512MB of RAM, but that's plenty for handling the existing app selection on Windows Phone -- we didn't have any issues using Skype or other apps, although we can't vouch for how future-proof this phone will be compared to Windows Phone devices housing 1GB of RAM.


The handset isn't going to weigh pockets down at 127 grams, but it's not the most slender phone out there, either. At 11mm (0.43 inch), it's actually incrementally thicker than the Lumia 920, but with this smaller form factor you shouldn't have any issues with one-handed control. Nokia's new phone is more comfortable to use, even if that means there's less screen to play with.

Display DNPNokia Lumia 620 review how an entrylevel smartphone should be


If you've been looking for a sub-4-inch Windows Phone 8 device, options have been pretty limited as of late. But here, you're getting a display that's appropriate for the price: a 3.8-inch touchscreen that matches the resolution of most Windows Phones -- that is, 800 x 480. Nokia's included its ClearBlack tech and an RGB Stripe pixel arrangement, while adding an anti-glare layer to improve outdoor visibility. Stack it against the Lumia 820, and it requires a bit more explaining.


In a way, the 620's screen looks better -- it's the same number of pixels in a smaller space, but it's no longer AMOLED. Colors appear slightly more muted on the 3.8-inch TFT in comparison, although it also lacks AMOLED's bluish overcast in white areas. Now, after dabbling with 4.7-inch displays you might think that the smaller display would make web browsing a little more frustrating, but page formatting remained pretty much identical among the three Windows Phone 8 Lumias.

Camera Nokia Lumia 620 review how an entrylevel smartphone should be


If there was one feature that we expected to be underwhelming, it was the camera. Despite the extent to which Nokia raved about the prowess of its optical image stabilization and Carl Zeiss lens, you won't find either here. Maximum image resolution drops to five megapixels, but the sensor is still capable of 720p capture, with an LED flash potent enough to light up your subject -- it's possibly a little too strong for close-up shots. The physical button launches into the camera almost immediately, with none of the lag of its predecessor, and with the same ability to lock focus with a half-press. We found in most situations that tapping the screen to focus offered a better lock. Nokia Lumia 620 sample shotsSee all photoswhen.eng("eng.galleries.init")



Unfortunately, we've still got the same complaints that we mention in most Windows Phone reviews: there's no HDR mode and the UI itself is relatively low on customizations.


The camera was able to take a handful of decent stills, although focus seemed slightly more temperamental than on other Windows Phones we've tested in the past. It still managed to give us some passable results in less favorable conditions, but if we were aiming for a close-up shot in better light settings, that reduced resolution made itself known in not-so-detailed results. That said, there's none of the fuzz and noise we've seen from other sub-£200 smartphone cameras we've tested in the past 12 months -- we're pointing our finger squarely at some of ZTE's and Huawei's cheap carrier-specific models.


Unfortunately, we've still got the same complaints that we mention in most Windows Phone reviews: there's no HDR mode, the UI itself is relatively low on customizations and there's no way to lock down exposure to avoid blowing out your images in bright light. However, the Panorama mode (above) and Nokia's GIF-crafting Cinemagraph are worth installing as they both add some extra talents to the camera.


More interested in video? Well, the Lumia 620 gives a decent showing here too. There's no optical image stabilization, but that remains a very rare addition to phone cameras, so it's hard to hold it against a colorful, rich recording. While a bit of breeze buffeted the mics, it picked up our voice (and some waterfowl noises) with perfect clarity.


Battery life and performance Nokia Lumia 620 review how an entrylevel smartphone should be


So, the Lumia 620 has the same resolution of the Lumia 820, memory expansion through microSD and even a pair of high-amplitude mics, but we had to see how Qualcomm's lesser Snapdragon S4 Plus processor would handle an almost-identical Windows Phone UX. You can lay any of those concerns to rest, as the 1GHz dual-core processor offered up a very similar experience; you're getting far more than what you pay for. We ran the Lumia 620 against both the Lumia 820 and Lumia 920, and found that the only major differences in performance were the startup times, with the smaller phone taking about five seconds longer to reach the home screen. Scrolling around on Internet Explorer 10 on any device resulted in largely the same level of speed and responsiveness, a testament either to Microsoft's mobile browser or to Qualcomm's processor know-how.



The dearth of highly polished Windows Phone games to push the technical abilities of the hardware makes it even harder to differentiate real-world performance between the three phones.


The 1,300mAh battery inside is smaller than the one found in the Lumia 800, although this time it's thankfully replaceable. During our WPBench rundown tests, which push the processor to the max until the battery cuts out, we averaged a time of 3:41. That puts it below the Lumia 900 but more than an hour beyond most Windows Phone 8 devices. It even bests the hardy HTC 8S. Naturally, this isn't representative of the battery with more moderate use, but the Lumia 620 did better in this regard, too. It typically gave us two days of use before cutting out. This entailed plenty of web browsing, listening to offline playlists and a handful of calls and email replies.


Nokia Lumia 620

Nokia Lumia 820 Nokia Lumia 900 HTC Windows Phone 8S WPBench 180 224 92 180 Battery rundown 3:41 2:07 4:29 3:30 SunSpider (ms, lower numbers are better) 1,443 909 6,902 1,415 AnTuTu 7,479 11,506 2,596 7,333 Its benchmark results don't stand up to phones with beastlier processors like the 820 or 920, but the 620 still manages a respectable sub-1,500 score on SunSpider. Meanwhile, the dearth of highly polished Windows Phone games to push the technical abilities of the hardware makes it even harder to differentiate real-world performance between the three phones. On the rare occasion the device froze, it was often during data upload from the camera app to SkyDrive, but the experience was otherwise smooth and without issue. The HSPA+ radio (WCDMA 850/900/1900/2100 and GSM/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900) promises speeds up to 21 Mbps down and 5.7 Mbps up. During our tests on Three UK, we were picking up download speeds of around 5 Mbps, while uploads hovered just below 1 Mbps. The good news is that this phone will work on both AT&T SIMs and T-Mobile's recently claimed 1900MHz HSPA+ spectrum, both data and voice. If Nokia US decides to offer the phone directly to customers, it could prove to be a tempting introduction to Windows Phone without the fiscal carrier hangover.

Software Nokia Lumia 620 review how an entrylevel smartphone should be


Read our Windows Phone 8 review? Or our reviews of those bigger Nokia models? Then sadly, there's not much new to tell you here. But that's actually good news -- despite those lower specifications, the phone gets Nokia Music and Maps, not to mention those Lumia-specific camera enhancements. Mix Radio throws in a substantial amount of offline music your way for free, while Nokia's map navigation loads quickly and reliably. There's also the option to download countrywide maps ahead of any trips abroad. Problems still left to be solved include some major apps that are MIA, including Dropbox, Instagram and Spotify -- the music service remains available on last-generation Windows Phone devices. Despite that Xbox brand association, gaming remains a shallow experience. If you're making noises about having Angry Birds in 2013, there's an issue.


It's also worth mentioning that after getting hands-on with (and feeling underwhelmed by) Windows Phone 7.8, we can't recommend picking up those old Lumia devices, even when they can now be bought for a similar price to this new Windows Phone. To get the full experience -- and join an app selection that will grow in the future -- you're going to have to pick up the Lumia 620, 820 or 920. Another benefit to the off-contract phone means there's no carrier bloatware to be found. The apps that do arrive pre-installed are mostly worth keeping around and getting rid of unwanted programs is just a long-press away.

Wrap-up Nokia Lumia 620 review how an entrylevel smartphone should be


The Lumia 620 represents a new high-watermark for entry-level smartphones, regardless of OS. Ignoring the app drawbacks, the phone provides a great web browser experience alongside the full Windows Phone 8 feature set. It could be a very exciting phone for Nokia -- it's an exciting one for us. We've mentioned the price several times during the review, but for a new smartphone with the latest version of its respective OS, it's a steal. The phone might house a less-capable camera, but for anyone sick of oversized, unwieldy, expensive smartphones, Nokia now has an entry-level Windows Phone to lure the bargain-hunting crowds away from Android, if the Nexus 4 proves too expensive.


What's more, it's arguably more attractive than most Google-powered phones around the same price point and could prove to be a huge hit among smartphone beginners. There's also a good chance that the more-gadget obsessed might pick up the Lumia 620 as a second device to give Microsoft's mobile OS a try -- and with compatibility on two US networks, it might be worth an import. It delivers real-world performance as good as Windows Phones that cost more than double. If anything, it's making us reconsider whether those other rivals are worth the extra outlay.

when.eng("eng.perm.init")

 

© 2013 PC Tech World. All rights resevered. Designed by Templateism

Back To Top