Showing posts with label changes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label changes. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Android 4.2.2 update reveals minor changes to Quick Settings and more

Android 4.2.2 update reveals minor changes to Quick Settings and more

Android 4.2.2 began arriving on an assortment of Nexus devices yesterday with "performance and stability" improvements listed as the only changes, but Android Police dug into Google's change logs and compiled a list of small tweaks. With the update on board, Play Store downloads now display the time left to their completion, and Android Debug Bridge security is shored-up with the addition of a whitelist. Now, WiFi and Bluetooth tiles can be toggled by a long press in the notification Quick Settings. The release also makes hardware play a tone when it begins to charge wirelessly with less than 95% juice left, and uses new low battery and cord-free charging chimes for the Nexus 4. Reports about possible Bluetooth fixes are mixed according to Android Police, and a reference to patching them up hasn't been spotted just yet. If you'd like to take a look at Mountain View's code commits, give the neighboring source link a jab.


Source: Android Police (1), (2)

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Foursquare changes privacy policy, but it shouldn't cause a ruckus

"Hello Foursquare community!

2012 has been a pretty huge year. We’ve released over fifty new features, welcomed nearly 15,000,000 new people to Foursquare, and had our 3,000,000,000th check-in. It’s a bit clichéd to say this, but your support really is what keeps us going day after day.

As our product evolves, one of the things we do is update our policies to match it. And a big aspect of that is privacy (something we think about a lot). This email lays out a couple changes that we’ll be making to our privacy policy in the coming month, and explains how they affect you and what you can do about it.

We know that privacy policies can be dense, so we put together a high-level document that we think of as our “Privacy 101.” It describes, in an easy-to-read way, how we build privacy into our product. While it doesn’t replace the legal need for the complete description of our privacy practices (which you can read here), we hope it helps you better understand how we think about privacy. We’ve also added new explanations of how privacy works throughout the app in our FAQs, including our default privacy settings and how they can be adjusted.

In addition to creating and refining those documents, we want to point out two specific changes to our policy, both of which will go into effect on January 28, 2013.

1. We will now display your full name. Currently, Foursquare sometimes shows your full name and sometimes shows your first name and last initial (“John Smith” vs. “John S.”). For instance, if you search for a friend in Foursquare, we show their full name in the results, but when you click through to their profile page you don’t see their last name. In the original versions of Foursquare, these distinctions made sense. But we get emails every day saying that it’s now confusing. So, with this change, full names are going to be public. As always, you can alter your ‘full name’ on Foursquare at https://foursquare.com/settings.

2. A business on Foursquare will be able to see more of their recent customers. Currently, a business using Foursquare (like your corner coffee shop) can see the customers who have checked in in the last three hours (in addition to the most recent and their most loyal visitors). This is great for helping store owners identify their customers and give them more personal service or offers. But a lot of businesses only have time to log in at the end of the day to look at it. So, with this change, we’re going to be showing them more of those recent check-ins, instead of just three hours worth. As always, if you’d prefer not to permit businesses to see when you check into their locations going forward, you can uncheck the box under ‘Location Information’ at https://foursquare.com/settings/privacy.

The Foursquare of today is so different than the first version that launched in 2009, and we appreciate that you let us continue to evolve and build our vision. This occasionally means altering our privacy policy. When we do, we make it a priority to come up with clear ways to help you understand your privacy choices, and to communicate them clearly. If you have any questions or want more details, head over to our updated privacy policy or support.foursquare.com.

Have a lovely holiday, and thanks for being part of the nearly 30,000,000-strong Foursquare community. We have a lot planned for 2013!

- Team Foursquare"-Email to Foursquare members


View the original article here

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Google may avoid FTC ruling by issuing voluntary changes

google, motorola, ftc, government, search, doj, anti-trust, deals, department of justice, acquisitions, federal trade commission, investigations, search engines, jon leibowitz, probes, consent decr

Following a year-and-a-half long anti-trust investigation, the Wall Street Journal reports that Google is expected to escape a final determination by the Federal Trade Commission thanks to the enactment of a number of "voluntary" measures -- a consent decree which the FTC believes will address original anti-trust concerns.

The deal's details are largely unknown, but the WSJ speculates that making it easier for companies to advertise on its website and increasing ad portability may be just two of the actions planned by the search giant. FTC Chairman

Originally, Jon Leibowitz has said he expected the probe to be wrapped up by the end of 2012, Politico reports. A final jugement has not yet been made.

Google, like many enormous enterprises, shares a long and entangled history with both the FTC and the Department of Justice. In addition to its home-grown market dominance, acquisitions like DoubleClick, AdMob and ITA have placed Google squarely in the sights of government trust-busters on more than one occasion. Google has periodically been scrutinized for potentially leveraging its search dominance to unfairly push its own services, like Google Maps and Google Places. Whether it does or not has remained a pivotal question, however.

Another anti-trust probe is investigating Google for possibly mishandling its Motorola patent portfolio by not properly licensing patents and pursuing court-issued injunctions to block competitors' products.

Incidentally, Google was smacked with a $22.5 million fine earlier this year -- the largest fine of its kind ever imposed by the FTC -- over a cookie-based debacle where Safari users were misled into falsely believing they had opted out of certain types of advertising.


View the original article here

 

© 2013 PC Tech World. All rights resevered. Designed by Templateism

Back To Top