Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Tokyo court fines Google for not censoring defamatory instant search results

Image


Remember the sad tale of the Japanese man that Google's Instant Search forced out of a job? Entering his name into the search bar, and Google's auto-complete algorithm tacked on accusations of nefarious acts that he was allegedly responsible for -- causing his employers to hand him his pink slip. Afterward, John Doe-san took Google to court, but Mountain View refused to intervene. That's why the Tokyo District Court has fined Google 300,000 yen ($3,068) for the mental distress, which will be paid to the unnamed individual in question.


Via: The Verge


Source: Economic Times / AP

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Japanese court declares Samsung patent invalid in another spat with Apple

Japanese court declares Samsung patent invalid in another spat with Apple


Weary of the neverending legal back-and-forth between Apple and Samsung yet? No, we're not either (that's a terrible lie), and the latest exciting development comes from a courtroom in Japan, where it was decided Samsung does not hold rights to certain data transmission tech it accused Apple of pinching. So, what are the repercussions? None, really -- the status quo remains unchanged, and Apple can continue selling the products Sammy wanted off the shelf. The Times of India notes that cases in the US and South Korea over the same patent have gone one a piece, meaning Apple is up 2-1 in this particular bout. But, when you've been battling for this long, you've bound to win some, and lose just as many.


Source: Reuters


Source

Friday, February 15, 2013

Facebook bests German watchdog in real names court tiff

Facebook bests German watchdog in real name case


After a German privacy watchdog ordered Facebook to allow the use of fake usernames "immediately," an appeals court has said nein. While the protection body in the tiny state of Schleswig-Holstein argued that Facebook's ban on pseudonyms breached the nation's privacy laws, an administrative court in the region ruled that those laws don't apply to the company, since its European HQ is located in less-stringent Ireland. Facebook argued that requiring the use of real names protects its users, but the regulator said it'll appeal the decision all the same -- thus prolonging the social network's long-running German headache.


Via: Techmeme


Source: Associated Press

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Egyptian court suspends YouTube for a month over controversial film



Users of YouTube in Egypt could face a month-long blackout of the service after an administrative court ruling ordered the website's suspension. The ministries of communication and investment have been ordered to block the popular video sharing site, reports news agency MENA, for hosting the movie short Innocence of Muslims. The American-made film has caused strong reactions since its release in September, at which point the initial complaint about YouTube's showing of it is said to have been made. Today's decision is a result of that ruling, and while the service should still currently remain online, Egypt's National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority has claimed it will uphold the suspension once it receives confirmation of the verdict. We've reached out to Google for comment.


Source: Reuters

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Australian High Court rescues Google, says it isn't responsible for the content of ads

Australian High Court rescues Google, says it isn't responsible for the content of ads


No one can doubt the stamina of Australia's consumer watchdog, the ACCC. For six long years it hauled Google from hearing to hearing, court to court, in the belief that the internet giant should be held responsible for any "misleading" advertisements displayed as search results. But now the ACCC must accept defeat. Five judges of Australia's High Court have unanimously overturned an earlier ruling from a lower court that would have required Google to set up a compliance program to vet ads. The upshot is that Mountain View can't be blamed if one of those ads turns out to be deceptive. The specific example that triggered the lawsuit -- that if someone had searched Google in 2006 for the words "Honda Australia," they'd have been shown a sponsored link from one of Honda's rivals -- may already seem like an outdated objection. As a result of this final ruling, that's exactly what it is.


Source: Reuters

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Italian court overturns Google executives' privacy convictions

A Milan appeals court Friday overturned the conviction of three Google managers for violating Italy's privacy laws by allowing the posting of a video showing the bullying of a handicapped student.

google law

The executives—Senior Vice President David Drummond, Chief Legal Officer Peter Fleischer and Chief Privacy Counsel George Reyes—were handed suspended six-month prison sentences by a Milan assize court in February 2010 for allowing the disturbing video to be posted on the Google Video website.

The appeals court upheld the lower court's decision to acquit the three Google executives of defamation, confirming the assize court's acquittal on that charge of Arvind Desikan, the former head of Google Video Europe.

The 2010 verdict set a legal precedent in Europe by holding executives of an Internet operator responsible for content posted on the Web by a third party.

Giulia Bongiorno, one of the lawyers acting for the Google executives, welcomed the ruling. "My reaction is of complete satisfaction but no surprise. Honestly, the convictions were based on nothing," Bongiorno told reporters.

Bongiorno said the new ruling established the principle that users rather than Internet operators were responsible for material posted on the Web. "The essential principle is that there is no obligation to exercise total control," for Internet service providers such as Google, she said. google video

The video showing the disabled boy being teased by classmates was first posted on Google Video on September 8, 2006, and was taken down a month later after Google received protests from a charitable organization representing Down Syndrome sufferers.

The victim and the charitable association, Vividown, both withdrew from the case after reaching a private settlement with Google.

"We're very happy that the verdict has been reversed and our colleagues' names have been cleared." Giorgia Abeltino, policy manager for Google Italy, said in a prepared statement.


View the original article here

 

© 2013 PC Tech World. All rights resevered. Designed by Templateism

Back To Top